Back to Air Force PDG Chapter 11 - Enlisted Evaluation System



Chapter 11 - Enlisted Evaluation System Notes


In the PDG Table of Contents, section 11D, paragraphs 11.24-11.26 have the wrong page numbers listed. 

11.24. Referral Reports ........................................ 237
11.25. Letter of Evaluation (LOE) .............................. 237
11.26. Conclusion .............................................. 237



Typo

11.22.9. AF Form 910, Section VII, and AF Form 911, Section X, Functional Examiner/Air Force Advisor. When the final evaluator on an EPR is not an Air Force officer or Department of the Air Force official, an Air Force advisor will be designated to advise raters on matters pertaining to Air Force performance reports. For EPRs on TSgts and below, the Air Force advisor will be MSgt or above. For EPRs on MSgt thru CMSgt, the Air Force advisor will be Major or above. The Air Force advisor will not change any statement or rating on the performance report. The advisor may use the AF Form 77 to provide clarification regarding ratee duty performance, according to AFI 36-2406, and attach it to the performance report. An Air Force advisor will have, or be able to obtain, knowledge of the ratee, be higher in grade than the ratee, and when feasible, be equal to or higher in grade than the final evaluator.


The following paragraph states that SMSgt selectees are not eligible for senior rater endorsement because they are not TIG eligible for the next promotion cycle. AFI 36-2406 Table 3.2 Note 15.c. states that they are under certain circumstances.

11.22.13. AF Form 911, Section IX, Time-in-Grade (TIG) Eligible.

Section IX pertains to TIG eligibility for senior rater endorsement—not the ratee’s actual promotion eligibility as of the closeout date. Using information extracted from the EPR notice, the rater completes Section IX before forwarding the EPR for additional endorsement. TIG does not apply to CMSgts, CMSgtselectees, or reservists. SMSgt-selectees are not eligible for senior rater endorsement because they are not TIG eligible for the next promotion cycle. AFI 36-2406 explains TIG eligibility.